Monday, 14 May 2012

An open letter to the Telegraph: get your DLA facts straight

Dear Daily Telegraph,

You had the scoop of the decade with MPs expenses. You are clearly a paper that employs excellent journalists with great research skills. It is a shame these skills weren't utilised when you interviewed Ian Duncan Smith yesterday about the changes to DLA.

Here are the basic mistakes in your article;
1. The subheader says IDS is going ahead with changes to DLA to "rid the system of abuse and fraud". The Government's own figures show DLA fraud is 0.5% for 2010/11. To start the article as you did just cements the idea in the mind of the public that all disabled people are scroungers and consequently kindles negative attitudes towards disabled people.

2. IDS says the number of claimants have risen by 30%. This isn't true. According to IDS's own department, the claimant case has risen by 16% amongst working-age claimants, to whom these changes will only apply, once population growth has been taken into account.

3. "The rigorous new process being introduced by Mr Duncan Smith could lead to those without limbs, including former soldiers, having their payments reduced as their everyday mobility is not undermined by their prosthetic limbs". If you read the Government's draft qualifying criteria for Personal Independence Payments (that is replacing DLA) you'd have realised this statement is disingenous. It clearly says that even if your everyday mobility is severely limited through amputation, under the new system you'll receive minimal support to help with this. Case study 7 says "Andy is 50. His left leg was crushed and had to be amputated above the knee and his right leg was also injured.The scar on his left stump has not healed very well so he has difficulties with his prosthesis and his right leg is weak. He finds it very tiring if he walks more than 40-50m so he often uses a wheelchair if he is going outdoors. Mobility activities = 10 (standard rate Mobility component)". This means that the Government recognises that Andy cannot walk more than 50metres, that, to use IDS's terminology, his 'everyday mobility' is undermined but will only award him 10 points. This means he will no longer be able to access the motobility scheme which allows him to rent a car to give him the freedom that his body no longer allows him.

4."In the assessment, lots of people weren’t actually seen. They didn’t get a health check or anything like that". To get DLA you are medically assessed by the doctors and hospital workers that see you regularly. They need to provide supporting evidence to the DWP that your disability or illness is as you have described it. The DWP regularly contacts doctors who have provided supporting evidence for extra information before it makes a decision. This is why it is actually very hard to be awarded DLA and why the fraud rate is so low.

5."Something like 70 per cent had lifetime awards, (which) meant that once they got it you never looked at them again". This 70 per cent figure may be true and it is very high, but to suggest that some people should not receive lifetime awards shouldn't automatically mean that no-one receives lifetime awards. Many claimants have degenerative incurable illnesses such as Parkinson's or, like me, Cystic fibrosis, or are permanently paralysed. We can't get better, so if we are found to need help this year then the same will be true in four years time. It is a waste of taxpayer's money to reassess all claimants every few years.

6. You quote IDS as saying "Tony Blair’s government tried to attack DLA, just to restrict it. We’re not doing that". Actually IDS is. The Government declared in its Budget 2010 policy costings document that it intends to save 20% from its DLA budget by changing the way it is allocated - this is the very definition of restricting DLA.

There are other things I do not agree with with this article, but as they are matters of tone not fact you have a right to editorial control over these issues. I appreciate that the Telegraph is right-leaning and therefore broadly supportive of the current Government, but by swallowing every fact uttered by IDS without question, this piece reads as a poor advertorial for the Government's cuts, and not as a strong, piece of quality journalism.

Yours sincerely,

Sharon

p.s. All links go to DWP or Government documents freely available on the web, so you could have easily found such reputable sources yourself.

24 comments:

  1. Feel free to post this on WtB.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brilliant post!! Wholeheartedly agree with all your points!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very well argued and explained.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. EXcellent! calm clear and courteously expressed !

    ReplyDelete
  6. They aren't 2010 figures, as I tweeted to you before you blocked me. Yr using 2004-2005 figures (see right hand column of the table you link to). Two wrongs don't make a right. I expect you will remove this is as you seem strangely allergic to facts yourself

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Anonymous,
    Firstly I think you should write under your real name not anonymous if you wish to have a proper debate. The document I linked to was published this year, all stats were 2010/2011 apart from the DLA stat which was 2004/2005 so i presume that is the latest available stat that the department has on DLA fraud. Please feel free to find me stats from 2010/2011 for DLA Fraud but I don't think they exist.
    I blocked you because you sent me multiple messages and didnt listen to my response. Your tweet that IB was DLA showed you didn't understand that they are two different benefits. I tried to explain this to you and therefore prove my stat for DLA fraud is correct but you kept sending me fraud stats for completely different benefits. My stat of 0.5% for DLA fraud is correct. Nothing you sent me showed me otherwise. I'm not allergic to facts but as I mentioned to you on twitter you're not being logical with your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very well said Sharon.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Well said Sharon - people who are not victims of the benefits system and this cruel government just don't understand!

    ReplyDelete
  10. thanku sharon

    ReplyDelete
  11. iam not the above anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  12. well put, but no one seems to listen to us these days.

    Diana

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks you for a concise and accurate response to this inflammatory and prejudicial article. Please, keep it up

    I was far less polite
    http://jaynelinney.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post

    ReplyDelete
  14. Excellent article. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great reply Sharon.
    I started a reply myself to the Telegraph, who are in the habit of inflamming disability issues. I found it too stressful and did not continue. Your words echo those I intended to make.

    It seems like this is part of Cameron's push to prove he is the hard man of the Right. He has no shame nor does the Coalition.

    Further articles have followed each day on a similar theme and for Wednesday it is all benfits are to be cut massively, furthe by 2015 -17. The removal of the Welfare State is in progress and these people have no mandate to do it. Wouldn't it be fun if the Coalition treated the banks and the rich and the elites in the same way they are treating the country's most vulnerable groups. No compassion is not the full story. This is warfare.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oh dear, the Independent are now at it as well

    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-sensible-reforms-that-must-be-fair-7754273.html

    I hope you don't mind me posting an extract of your letter...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Covered what I thought while reading the article! The trouble is, everything IDS says chimes with the wider public. Understand, I'm not saying he's not lying (because it comes as second nature to him and Grayling!) but just that he's lied in such a way that people want to believe him. The only way to keep fighting his rhetoric is posts like these so thank you for compiling this list.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Latest Hot Entertainment News, Latest update about Bollywood, hollywood, pakistani Girls
    hotentertainnews.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. Jobs at your Home, Internet Online Jobs like data entry, copy pasting, Form Filling, Facebook Sharing Jobs, Clicking Jobs, Web Surfing, Google Jobs and Much More Earning Systems Online
    www.jobzcorner.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. Most Expensive Cars in the World, Top Concept Cars, Top Strange Vehicles in the World and Car latest hot top Wallpapers
    worldlatestvehicles.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. World's Most Popular Cars, Hot Speed Cars, Hot Cars with Hot Girls, Cars Latest Pictures with all info, Latest updates Cars Models and Company Cars, Strange Vehicles, Concept Cars, Top 10 Expensive Cars in the World.
    Visit this Link for More Strange Vehicles and Cars with Latest info and Pictures
    WorldLatestVehicles.com

    ReplyDelete
  22. Its Awkward to Say some one you are doing Lol.... Every thing you want in Lol and Troll, Now you Get all in one Network, LolsGag, Lol Pictures, Lol Videos, Lol Peoples, Funny Peoples, Troll Images, Awkwards Text, Funny Comics, Jokes, Funny Jokes, Funny Facts, Humour, Funny Planet, troll pictures, funny pictures, Facebook pictures, facebook funny pictures, facebook lol pictures, Funny videos and Much More only Laughing out of Laughing
    lolsgag.com

    ReplyDelete
  23. This herb supplements the body with vital nutrients which are in bio-available form, bio-availability of nutrients allows them to get absorbed by the body easily. This herb promotes higher number of energy producing reactions in the body, the nutrients supplemented work as raw material for these reactions and produce higher energy in the body.
    LOL Elo Boost
    Buy League of Legends Boost

    ReplyDelete